Published April 2026 via Knopf
★★★★★
Natalie has it figured out: a farm in rural Idaho, a passel of kids dressed in neutral tones, a conservative-friendly, back-to-the-land lifestyle, and a social media following that's enough to keep her in cashmere sweaters. If the farm isn't actually organic, and if there are actually farmhands and nannies and producers behind the scenes, and if she carries a deep-seated rage carefully covered up by her cashmere sweaters—well, nobody needs to know, do they?
Until Natalie wakes up in the 1800s version of her life. Same house...minus the nice clothing, the nannies, the running water. Minus everything that made back-to-the-land feel feasible. Children who aren't quite the ones she knows. A husband who isn't quite the one she knows. Is it a joke? A reality show? Has she been kidnapped? Influencer-Natalie wasn't happy...but 1800s Natalie is desperate to get back to that life.
How boring. How deeply and utterly unfair. I did everything I was supposed to. I had the children and married the man and created a universe for all of us to live in, and what was I going to get for it? (loc. 5258*)
There's a publisher's note at the beginning of this one that describes Yesteryear as "by far, the most buzzed about novel of 2026" (loc. 4). I'll take that with a grain of it's-the-publisher-saying-it, but it's backed up with mention of a fifteen-publisher bidding war, and frankly...having read it, I get the hype.
There are two things about the book that might be divisive: The first is the eventual reveal about what landed Natalie in an 1800s version of her life. No spoilers, but it takes a while, partly because Natalie isn't really in shape to figure it out...and it definitely kept me guessing. The second is Natalie herself: my gosh but she's a bit of a cow. She's not written to be likable, and, well, she isn't. She's calculating and judgemental and angry. She's done all the things her religion tells her that she should, and it hasn't been enough; she's turned herself into a conservative's version of a perfect woman, or perhaps a caricature of one, and it hasn't been enough. She still doesn't have what she wants, and she's still not happy. What fascinates me is the way Natalie digs in—she's willing to believe that she can try something more, but not willing to think that she could try something different.
The woman in the videos, with her flipbook of smiles? That was Online Natalie, and she was designed to be good at being alive. Nothing was hard for her: not motherhood, not marriage, not building a business, not serving Him. All of it appeared to her as a series of tasks to be accomplished each day, at the right time, in the correct chronological order.
Online Natalie started each morning by giving thanks for all the Lord had given her. She greeted her children lovingly each morning. She had sex with her husband every night. She was tired all the time, but it never made her ugly or angry or bitter. It only ever made her more beautiful.
And she was right there, wasn't she? Standing, smiling, beckoning. Any day now, I would wrap my fingers around her neck and pull her forward. Let her topple into me. (loc. 3872)
Natalie is fascinating. You don't want to be her; you don't want to know her. You might or might not think "this is what I would do differently in her shoes". But she is so on point in this age of Christian influencers and momfluencers. If she's not taken directly from real life, she's only a step or so removed.
I don't give five-star ratings lightly, but this is one that will stick with me.
*Quotes are from an ARC and may not be final.
Thanks to the author and publisher for providing a review copy through NetGalley.









